Contents:
To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Don't already have an Oxford Academic account?
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In.
However, the analyst, while imagining the sexual and aggressive feel- ings Miss K had for him, was not examining his contribution to a co- construction of Miss K's experience of him. Second, this title uses the word "practice" to describe clinical work. As such, they represent flawed metaphors for complex psychological processes that have insinuated them- selves into what has become our shared cultural endowment, so much so that they are treated as expressions of ordinary common sense Stolorow, Atwood, and Orange Here again, we see the separation of a hypothetical internal world from an ob- jectively knowable external reality. This was regarded as an indication of I-It relationships. Oxford Academic.
Advanced Search. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation.
Buirski rightly places Practicing Intersubjectively in the theoretical tradition established by Stolorow et al., with their emphasis on understanding development. Editorial Reviews. Review. Buirski rightly places Practicing Intersubjectively in the theoretical tradition established by Stolorow et al., with their emphasis on.
Volume Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Cite Citation.
Permissions Icon Permissions. Abstract The focus of this article is on illustrating how the differences between the paternalistic and empowerment approaches embedded within social work have unnecessarily evolved into competing approaches to practice. Issue Section:.
You do not currently have access to this article. Download all figures. Sign in. You could not be signed in.
Sign In Forgot password? Cite Citation. Permissions Icon Permissions. Abstract The focus of this article is on illustrating how the differences between the paternalistic and empowerment approaches embedded within social work have unnecessarily evolved into competing approaches to practice. Issue Section:. You do not currently have access to this article. Download all figures. Sign in.
You could not be signed in. Sign In Forgot password? Don't have an account?
National Association of Social Workers members Sign in via society site. Sign in via your Institution Sign in. Purchase Subscription prices and ordering Short-term Access To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve.
View Metrics. Email alerts New issue alert. Advance article alerts.
Article activity alert. Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Related articles in Web of Science Google Scholar. Citing articles via Web of Science 6.