Contents:
Jurisprudence Morality and Economics. Hacker Pardo particular person philosophical physical presuppose privilege probative problems psychological question reasons relevant requires responsibility retributivism retributivist role rule self-incrimination Semrau someone studies subjects supra note supra note 16 testimony theory tion trolley trolley problems types voluntary.
Michael S. Pardo and Dennis Patterson. As neuroscientific technologies continue to develop and inform our understanding of the mind, the opportunities for applying neuroscience in legal proceedings have also increased. Cognitive neuroscientists have deepened our understanding of. Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Keywords: mind, brain, neuroscience, fMRI, EEG, conceptual, empirical.
His scholarship explores epistemological issues in the areas of evidence, criminal procedure, civil procedure, and jurisprudence, with a specific focus on legal proof. He is a co-author of the fifth edition of Evidence: Text, Problems, and Cases , with Allen, Kuhns, Swift, and Schwartz , and the author of numerous articles in distinguished law reviews and legal philosophy journals.
His scholarship includes legal theory, commercial law, and trade law. He is the series editor of The Oxford Introductions to U.
He has published widely in jurisprudence, commercial law, trade law, and EU law. Table of Cases. If you are happy with the product, please leave positive feedback and we will automatically leave positive feedback for you.
If you are unhappy with the transaction for any reason, please contact us first to resolve. If you do leave negative or neutral feedback you waive your rights for support regarding any problems with us and open yourself up for possible retaliatory negative feedback. Please avoid making negative feedback remarks, contact us first if you have any problems!
We are here to help! Please contact us via eBay messages if you have any questions and our Customer Service team will be happy to assist you with any queries.
Thank you. Cognitive neuroscientists have deepened our understanding of the complex relationship between mind and brain and complicated the relationship between mental attributes and law.
New arguments and conclusions based on functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI , electroencephalography EEG , and other increasingly sophisticated technologies are being applied to debates and processes in the legal field, from lie detection to legal doctrine surrounding criminal law, including the insanity defense to legal theory.
Pardo and Dennis Patterson analyze questions that lie at the core of implementing neuroscientific research and technology within the legal system.
They examine the arguments favoring increased use of neuroscience in law, the scientific evidence available for the reliability of neuroscientific evidence in legal proceedings, and the integration of neuroscientific research into substantive legal doctrines. The authors also explore the basic philosophical questions that lie at the intersection of law, mind, and neuroscience.
In doing so, they argue that mistaken inferences and conceptual errors arise from mismatched concepts, such as the disconnect between lying and what constitutes "lying" in many neuroscientific studies.