Contents:
In the latter case, we inhabit a much more hospitable universe where there is some sort of inherent order: a place where morality is inscribed into the very fabric of things, assuring us that, if only we play by the rules, evil will be punished, goodness will be rewarded, and justice will reign supreme.
It is easy to understand the attraction of that vision. But it has a substantial dark side. Like any theodicy, it cannot simply unmake suffering, and so it instead tries to justify it. The claim that the universe is inherently just then implies that those who suffer deserve it.
And so, hundreds of thousands of Haitians died because their ancestors made a pact with the devil. Women and homosexuals agitating for equal rights are blamed for deadly natural disasters.
Such a worldview conveniently scapegoats someone, usually whatever population someone wishes to demonise: women, homosexuals, the poor, etc. It also normalises social ills that could otherwise be addressed and meliorated. In a dark irony, holding that the universe is ultimately a just place ends up condoning the suffering and injustice that happens within it, often on the backs of those most in need. Visions of a just universe need not function this way. Theodicy authorises only the suffering of the less fortunate when it indulges in willful blindness and insists on justice as a foregone conclusion, denying reality in favour of comforting ignorance.
Alternatively, when justice is construed as hope — as a vision of what the world could possibly be — it functions as a lodestar. This acknowledges the disturbing realities with which we are surrounded, and refuses to be disillusioned by them. The just universe in which we should believe is the one that can be created only through dedicated effort and real action on our part. But that can happen only if we refuse to take shelter in soothing fantasies. Kate Kirkpatrick.
These approaches begin with the premise that evil cannot be explained; that it is a mystery Surin, Buddhist would ask : how to understand suffering? Job makes the important point that providing explanations for suffering can heighten the alienation experienced. Volume 55 Issue 1 Jan , pp. I return five hours later to find the mansion on fire, Susan out in front with three of the children.
Nigel T Rothfels. Become a Friend of Aeon to save articles and enjoy other exclusive benefits Make a donation.
The Good and Evil Angels —c. Aeon for Friends Find out more. Roughly, it can be summarised as follows: If God is omnipotent, then He has the power to create a world without evil. The sentence contains offensive content. Cancel Submit. Your feedback will be reviewed. Theodicy is the problem of how to reconcile a just God with a world containing evil. It is impossible for her to produce a theodicy for horrendous infant suffering. What is the pronunciation of theodicy?
Browse thence. Test your vocabulary with our fun image quizzes. Image credits. Word of the Day pommel horse. Blog Weighed down or perking up? Phrasal verbs to express emotions, part 1 September 18, Each Name deals with one of the 99 root-manifestations of "Allah", and belong to His immanent order or revelation. The supreme first engendering command which ignites these Names is : "Be" and through them the Cosmos is created.
Some of these Names deal with the essence of "Allah". The Name "Allah" refers to the all-comprehensive unity of all possible Divine Self-disclosures through 99 Names. Inasmuch as He displays His signs in the cosmos, the cosmos is good through His unlimited goodness.
Only "Allah" is absolutely good and absolute evil does not exist.
The Real is never fully absent from the cosmos His immanence nor ever fully present within it His transcendence. The God's Essence however is His transcendence. All Divine Names demand loci of manifestation in the cosmos. All Divine Names are good when conceived as essentially belonging to "Allah" alone. Because they are the "formula" of creation itself, these Names also contain "imperfection", in that they demand what we normally look upon as lacks and deficiencies, like "the Avenger", "the Humiliator", "the Dishonorer", "the Slayer", "the Punisher".
But since "Allah" is named by them, man to be perfect must also be named by them. But, to the extent he does assume them being part of his innate disposition he must take care to display them in the manner set down in the Law, i. This is why servitude is the supreme "adornment" or to become qualified by the Divine character traits. The Law directs all traits into proper channels, so "Allah" is satisfied.
Moreover, in order to allow creation to unfold, these "imperfections" are necessary. If they were not, there would be nothing "other than Allah". Then there would be no cosmos. Hence, without imperfection, the perfection of existence could never become. So evil is in essence good serves the purpose of The God's creation.
Theodicy in its most common form, is an attempt to answer the question of why a good God permits the manifestation of evil, thus resolving the issue of the. Theodicy, (from Greek theos, “god”; dikē, “justice”), explanation of why a perfectly good, almighty, and all-knowing God permits evil. Others, drawing a distinction between a theodicy and a more limited “defense,” have sought to show only that the existence of some evil in the.
Perfection however, is the essential attribute of every creature, while imperfection is an accident whose essence is again perfection. Three problems arise here : 1 if all actual events are pre-determinated at the level of the Divine Names, then there is no real free will and so no moral sense no justice and true care ; 2 the danger of moral permissiveness is great all evil being essentially a higher good, we can always say : "Inshallah!
Is this not a scandal? Evil in Chaostheory. Besides existing in the perverted free will, chaostheory puts into evidence disorder and unbalance are natural, dynamical properties of a system, i. Life itself can not be properly defined without the presence of non-linear, aperiodical, complex, irregular, not quite predictable, not completely erratic, more or less determinable movements introducing symmetry-breaks.
Often these movements are completely chaotic but can be characterized by a strange attractor in the phase-space depicting the route of the movement. Hence, chaos is ruled by a higher-order calculus. Natural chaos is a form of order demons were fallen angels.
Traditional theodicy remained too dependent of privation. Chaos is indeed a something , namely a positive type of movement expressing the rule of a higher-order, a meta-form. This is more than holes in a Swiss cheese. Chaostheory breaks away from a modern picture on being with its emphasis on a linear approach.
This is rooted in the scholastic notion of "chaos" as " privatio ". In such an approach, order-within-chaos and chaos-within-order were unthinkable. As a result, no realistic interpretation of evil was presented. The good resulting from complex systems learning to steer chaos well was not appreciated the formula of Esther ignored. Non-linearity taboo.
In the dissipative theory of Prigogine, this equilibrium is rejected. The theory of non-equilibrium explains the processes of life, whereas the traditional view applies to physical systems only. Evolution evidences the tenacity with which intelligent systems overcome massive turbulence. The choices we make -as free actors and co-creators of being- will define our ability to steer chaos well.
So most choose for their little order and reject, repress or discard chaos. So repression the 'wrong' kind of silence is never a creative solution and will never allow a system to understand the chaos at hand and move to an even higher level of conscious functioning, with better knowledge, better understanding and more awareness. These particular abstracts co-determine the flow of events which constitute nominal existence and this by influencing the probable outcome through their respective form, code, information cf. God as the Lord of Possibilities - cf.
So although seemingly separated from the factual actual world, the Creator cf. The presence of evil in the factual realm is to be expected. The natural kingdoms of Earth mineral, vegetal, animal, human each have their own degree of liberty. Clashed between independent evolutionary movements often occur.
Those caught in the clash name it "evil". The more evolved a system is, the more capable it plays the game of survival.
The cultures of humanity are proof of an excellent degree of freedom. This means the human has to stand up by his own cf. Marcus Aurelius. Only when a paternalistic concept of the Divine is maintained can the so-called "silence" of God be interpreted as proof of His triviality. In fact, humanity is called to exercise its free will in concert. The majority of scandalous evils are the direct result of human unwillingness to face its own mismanagment and incompetence.